Skip to content

Real World Bridge 7: The Slam Zone

The Importance of Extra Values

Classes on slam bidding tend to focus on keycards and controls, but we have found that, more often, the most difficult challenge is determining whether we and partner – combined – have enough strength to make slam worth investigating.

Example 3.06.

East:    K84      KQ   AK8  K10965   18 HCP, KR 17.75

West: AQ1062  A62  1052     AJ                15 HCP, KR 16.35

WestNorthEastSouth
1♠Pass2♣Pass
2NTPass4♠All pass

Our opponents missed this slam. If West had opened one notrump, East (with 18 HCP) would have driven to slam. West’s two notrump was ambiguous about strength; if West had been able to show extra values, East would have driven to slam. East’s four spade rebid was ambiguous about strength; if East had been able to show three-card spade support with more than a minimum, West (with three Aces and nice trumps) would have been alert to the possibility of slam.

The EW problems weren’t about convention card details; they were playing two-over-one-game-forcing and Key Card Blackwood, and they knew about control bidding; rather the problems were about not having agreed how to differentiate between minimum hands and hands with extra values.

Example 3.07. Slam is basically cold, but only 55 of 118 pairs bid a slam (23 chose six notrump, 32 chose six hearts). Deal V76.

Responder:     K108  1042  AKJ3  KQ3            16 HCP, KR 15.90

Opener:           A3   AQJ76   98    AJ87            16 HCP, KR 18.15

When opener started with one heart, typically responder bid a game forcing two diamonds, and now many pairs (lacking good agreements about various continuations) were unable to determine that the two combined hands were in the Slam Zone. When opener started with one notrump (15-17, actually an underbid according to KR), typically responder invited slam and opener accepted.

Bonus from Val: The responding hand is 4-3-3-3 (bad) but has only one Jack, good spot cards, and the four-card suit is strong, so after reading this book you should be thinking “not an upgrade and not a downgrade either.” With opener’s hand, you should be thinking “Wow”: three Aces, honors concentrated in the long suits, great five-card suit, nice four-card side suit.

Example 3.08. Slam is basically cold, but only about half of the field bid slam (most chose six notrump not six clubs). Deal V93.

Responder:     KQ9      K       J93  A109874     13 HCP, KR 13.00

Opener:           A1075  AJ3  AK106    K5          19 HCP, KR 20.60

When opener started with two notrump (either because playing a 19-20 range or because opener upgraded), reaching slam was relatively easy, but when opener started with one diamond, responder bid a game forcing two clubs, and many pairs were unable to determine that the two hands (combined) were in the Slam Zone.

Bonus from Val: Opener’s hand is another “Wow”: three Aces, two tens, both four-card suits are strong, only one “Quack”.